header image
The world according to David Graham


acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. PMO Staff Run Government; Ministers Represent It
  2. On A Mostly Harmless Birthday
  3. The Trouble With Political Communications
  4. Politics: War By Other Means
  5. On the function of Social media
  6. C-18 is an existential threat, not a benefit, to democracy
  7. On Missing A Little More Than A Sub
  8. The Realpolitik Of Open Nomination
  9. What Is An Open Nomination, Really?
  10. Alberta election about identity, not policy
  11. The Trouble With Electoral Reform
  12. Mr. Bains Goes to Rogers
  13. Question Period
  14. Why do lockdowns and pandemic restrictions continue to exist?
  15. Parliamentary privilege: an arcane concept that can prevent coups
  16. It's not over yet
  17. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  18. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  19. Next steps
  20. On what electoral reform reforms
  21. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  22. 2019 Summer newsletter / infolettre été 2019
  23. 2019-07-15 SECU 171
  24. 2019-06-20 RNNR 140
  25. 2019-06-17 14:14 House intervention / intervention en chambre
  26. 2019-06-17 SECU 169
  27. 2019-06-13 PROC 162
  28. 2019-06-10 SECU 167
  29. 2019-06-06 PROC 160
  30. 2019-06-06 INDU 167
  31. older entries...

2016-10-19 16:30 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Cabinet Ministers, Government bills, Regional development agencies, Second reading,

Deuxième lecture, Membres du cabinet, Organismes de développement régional

Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate my colleague on toeing his party line so well with that question.

These ministerial positions, which have yet to be named, are meant to support the expansion of any government, whether ours or any future government formed by another party. Thus, there will be no need to change the legislation every time there is a change in cabinet. Needs change over time, and so cabinet must change, too. Why should we have to come back to Parliament every time to make small administrative changes in the executive branch?

As for the regional development agencies, why do we need six ministers all doing the same thing? Is that the kind of job creation the member advocates?

Monsieur le Président, je félicite mon collègue d'avoir très bien suivi sa ligne de parti en posant sa question.

La création de ces postes de ministres sans nom vise à faciliter l'expansion de n'importe quel gouvernement, que ce soit le nôtre ou un futur gouvernement constitué par un autre parti. Ainsi, on n'aura pas à changer la loi chaque fois qu'il y a un changement dans le Cabinet ministériel. Les besoins changent avec le temps et le Cabinet aussi. Pourquoi faudrait-il revenir chaque fois au Parlement pour faire des petits changements administratifs du côté de l'exécutif?

En ce qui concerne les agences de développement régional, pourquoi aurait-on besoin de six ministres pour faire la même tâche? Est-ce que c'est cela, le genre de création d'emplois que prône le député?

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 13:26 on October 19, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-10-19 16:22 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv |

2016-10-19 16:31 House intervention / intervention en chambre

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.