header image
The world according to David Graham

Topics

acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  2. January 17th, 2020
  3. January 16th, 2020
  4. January 15th, 2020
  5. January 14th, 2020
  6. January 13th, 2020
  7. January 12th, 2020
  8. January 11th, 2020
  9. January 10th, 2020
  10. January 9th, 2020
  11. January 8th, 2020
  12. January 7th, 2020
  13. January 6th, 2020
  14. January 5th, 2020
  15. January 4th, 2020
  16. January 3rd, 2020
  17. January 2nd, 2020
  18. January 1st, 2020
  19. December 31st, 2019
  20. December 30th, 2019
  21. December 29th, 2019
  22. December 28th, 2019
  23. December 27th, 2019
  24. December 26th, 2019
  25. December 24th, 2019
  26. December 6th, 2019
  27. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  28. Next steps
  29. On what electoral reform reforms
  30. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  31. older entries...

2016-03-21 17:53 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Freedom of conscience and religion, Office of Religious Freedom, Opposition motions

Bureau de la liberté de religion, Liberté de conscience et de religion,

Madam Speaker, I congratulate the member for Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock on his excellent speech. The freedom to have this debate is a freedom that is dear to us all.

Do human rights begin and end with religious freedom? Not to me. I agree that the Office of Religious Freedom is inadequate on its own and that the motion therefore does not deserve our support.

Freedom is a puzzle with many pieces in addition to religion. Many kinds of freedoms make up the basic rights that, together, create a truly free society. The Conservatives' motion is not worded in a way that promotes religious freedom, so this is yet another missed opportunity for the opposition.

In my Conservative colleague's opinion, what leadership role might Canada play in the world to ensure equal protection for all freedoms? Are there any freedoms that my colleague would choose not to protect on the international stage?

Madame la Présidente, je félicite le député de Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock pour son excellent discours. La liberté de tenir ce débat est une liberté qui nous est chère à tous.

Les droits humains sont-ils limités aux libertés religieuses? D'après moi, non, ils ne le sont pas. Je suis d'accord pour dire que le Bureau de la liberté de religion n'est pas adéquat, tout seul, et donc que la motion ne mérite pas notre appui comme tel.

Le casse-tête des libertés ne se limite pas à la religion. Il existe plusieurs formes de liberté qui font partie des droits fondamentaux qui, ensemble, créent une société véritablement libre. La motion des conservateurs n'est pas formulée d'une manière à promouvoir la liberté de religion et c'est encore une occasion manquée par l'opposition officielle.

Selon mon collègue conservateur, quel rôle de leadership le Canada pourrait-il jouer dans le monde pour la protection égale de toutes les libertés? Y a-t-il des libertés que mon collègue choisirait de ne pas protéger sur la scène internationale?

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 15:26 on March 21, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-03-21 16:52 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv | 2016-03-22 PROC 13

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.