header image
The world according to David Graham

Topics

acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  2. January 17th, 2020
  3. January 16th, 2020
  4. January 15th, 2020
  5. January 14th, 2020
  6. January 13th, 2020
  7. January 12th, 2020
  8. January 11th, 2020
  9. January 10th, 2020
  10. January 9th, 2020
  11. January 8th, 2020
  12. January 7th, 2020
  13. January 6th, 2020
  14. January 5th, 2020
  15. January 4th, 2020
  16. January 3rd, 2020
  17. January 2nd, 2020
  18. January 1st, 2020
  19. December 31st, 2019
  20. December 30th, 2019
  21. December 29th, 2019
  22. December 28th, 2019
  23. December 27th, 2019
  24. December 26th, 2019
  25. December 24th, 2019
  26. December 6th, 2019
  27. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  28. Next steps
  29. On what electoral reform reforms
  30. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  31. older entries...

2016-03-21 16:52 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Freedom of conscience and religion, Office of Religious Freedom, Opposition motions

Bureau de la liberté de religion, Liberté de conscience et de religion,

Mr. Speaker, one of the wonders of freedom is that the member for Calgary Midnapore can challenge our logic with his own logic, and we can have a completely civilized conversation based on fundamental and sometimes irreconcilable philosophical disagreements.

One wonders, then, why that same member has not spent his political capital on the promotion of an office of political freedom. Freedom of the press, of scientific research, and otherwise of personal choices has never been a particular forte for the hon. member or his recent government.

Religious freedom is an important freedom, indeed, a very important freedom, but it is only one freedom in a suite of freedoms that allow a society to define itself as free.

My wife is from the province of Sultan Kudarat on the Island of Mindanao, a place the member referred to. When I was there a few years ago, there was a major bombing only a few cities from where I was staying. The civil war that has existed there for more than a generation is not something that would be addressed by the Office of Religious Freedom either way. It is a red herring in this debate.

Freedom of association and assembly are necessary for the freedom of religion, as well as the freedom of thought, of being political, of reading, of writing, and of communicating on topics of our own interest, of having freedom of debate.

The Office of Religious Freedom is only one piece of the puzzle in defending basic human rights and liberties, but it is a large puzzle with many pieces. Does restricting our protection of human rights internationally to only—

Monsieur le Président, l'un des avantages de la liberté, c'est que le député de Calgary Midnapore peut contester notre logique avec sa propre logique et que nous pouvons avoir une discussion tout à fait civilisée fondée sur des divergences fondamentales et parfois irréconciliables de principes.

On peut se demander, alors, pourquoi ce même député n'a pas consacré de capital politique à la promotion d'un bureau de la liberté politique. La liberté de la presse, de la recherche scientifique et des choix de chacun n'ont jamais été les points forts du député ni de son gouvernement.

La liberté de religion est importante, et même très importante, mais c'est une liberté parmi toutes les libertés qui permettent à une société de se définir comme une société libre.

Mon épouse vient de la province de Sultan Kudarat, sur l'île de Mindanao, un endroit dont a parlé le député. Lorsque je m'y trouvais, il y a quelques années, un bombardement majeur est survenu à quelques villes de l'endroit où j'étais. La guerre civile qui fait rage là-bas depuis plus d'une génération ne serait pas réglée grâce au Bureau de la liberté de religion de toute façon. Ce n'est qu'un faux-fuyant dans ce débat.

La liberté d'association et de réunion est nécessaire à la liberté de religion, ainsi que la liberté de penser, de faire de la politique, de lire, d'écrire et de communiquer sur des sujets qui nous intéressent, et la liberté de débat.

Le Bureau de la liberté de religion n'est qu'une pièce du casse-tête que constitue la défense des libertés et des droits fondamentaux, et il s'agit d'un grand casse-tête qui compte beaucoup de pièces. Limiter la protection des droits de la personne à l'échelle internationale à seulement...

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 15:26 on March 21, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-03-21 16:23 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv |

2016-03-21 17:53 House intervention / intervention en chambre

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.