header image
The world according to David Graham

Topics

acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  2. January 17th, 2020
  3. January 16th, 2020
  4. January 15th, 2020
  5. January 14th, 2020
  6. January 13th, 2020
  7. January 12th, 2020
  8. January 11th, 2020
  9. January 10th, 2020
  10. January 9th, 2020
  11. January 8th, 2020
  12. January 7th, 2020
  13. January 6th, 2020
  14. January 5th, 2020
  15. January 4th, 2020
  16. January 3rd, 2020
  17. January 2nd, 2020
  18. January 1st, 2020
  19. December 31st, 2019
  20. December 30th, 2019
  21. December 29th, 2019
  22. December 28th, 2019
  23. December 27th, 2019
  24. December 26th, 2019
  25. December 24th, 2019
  26. December 6th, 2019
  27. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  28. Next steps
  29. On what electoral reform reforms
  30. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  31. older entries...

2016-09-26 17:17 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Accountability, Financial management, Government bills, Labour unions, Public Service and public servants, Third reading and adoption,

Fonction publique et fonctionnaires, Gestion financière, Obligation de rendre compte, Syndicats, Troisième lecture et adoption

Mr. Speaker, in the previous Parliament, I was an assistant and not a member, but in the debate on Bill C-377, the Liberals proposed an amendment. They actually did a good job in opposition, unlike the current one. The amendment sought to extend this obligation to all professional bodies, not just unions. The Conservatives opposed it.

Why did the Conservatives want to target just unions and not all professional bodies?

Monsieur le Président, dans le dernier Parlement, quand on discutait du projet de loi C-377 — j'étais adjoint et non député à ce moment-là —, une modification a été proposée par les libéraux. C'était une bonne opposition, non pas comme l'actuelle opposition. Celle-ci proposait d'étendre cette obligation à tous les ordres professionnels et non seulement aux syndicats. Les conservateurs s'y sont opposés.

Pourquoi les conservateurs voulaient-ils cibler seulement les syndicats et non tous les professionnels?

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 15:26 on September 26, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-09-26 13:19 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv |

2016-09-26 17:46 House intervention / intervention en chambre

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.