header image
The world according to David Graham

Topics

acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  2. January 17th, 2020
  3. January 16th, 2020
  4. January 15th, 2020
  5. January 14th, 2020
  6. January 13th, 2020
  7. January 12th, 2020
  8. January 11th, 2020
  9. January 10th, 2020
  10. January 9th, 2020
  11. January 8th, 2020
  12. January 7th, 2020
  13. January 6th, 2020
  14. January 5th, 2020
  15. January 4th, 2020
  16. January 3rd, 2020
  17. January 2nd, 2020
  18. January 1st, 2020
  19. December 31st, 2019
  20. December 30th, 2019
  21. December 29th, 2019
  22. December 28th, 2019
  23. December 27th, 2019
  24. December 26th, 2019
  25. December 24th, 2019
  26. December 6th, 2019
  27. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  28. Next steps
  29. On what electoral reform reforms
  30. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  31. older entries...

2016-05-02 21:28 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Caregivers and health care professionals, Government bills, Health care system, Medical assistance in dying, Second reading

Aide médicale à mourir, Deuxième lecture, Soignants et professionnels de la santé, Système de soins de santé,

Mr. Speaker, palliative care is, indeed, a very important issue.

There are many people here who believe the bill goes too far. There are many others who do not believe it goes far enough, and I fall generally in that camp. I think we could do a lot more, but I appreciate the compromise presented in this bill.

The member for Spadina—Fort York who spoke earlier is correct in that anything we do will face further challenges. For better or for worse, I do not believe this file is ever going to be completely closed. It is too close to the hearts of too many people. I think all members can agree with that.

The member wants to resolve a number of conflicts she sees between the bill and the Supreme Court ruling. I am wondering if the member plans to submit amendments to achieve that very thing at committee, and if she agrees that the committee process is the best way to address these issues within the tight timelines we face.

Monsieur le Président, la question des soins palliatifs est effectivement très importante.

Bien des députés estiment que le projet de loi va trop loin. De nombreux autres pensent qu'il ne va pas assez loin. Je suis généralement de cet avis. Je crois que nous pourrions aller beaucoup plus loin, mais je suis content du compromis que représente le projet de loi.

Le député de Spadina—Fort York, qui a pris la parole tout à l'heure, a raison de dire que tout ce que nous ferons sera contesté. Que ce soit une bonne chose ou non, je ne pense pas que ce dossier sera un jour complètement clos. Cette question touche de trop près aux convictions intimes des gens. Je crois que tous les députés en conviendront.

La députée souhaite régler un certain nombre d'incompatibilités qu'elle voit entre le projet de loi et l'arrêt de la Cour suprême. Compte-t-elle saisir le comité d'amendements qui permettront de les régler? Admet-elle que l'étude en comité est la meilleure façon de régler ces questions, étant donné notre échéancier très serré?

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 15:26 on May 02, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-05-02 11:50 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv |

2016-05-02 21:44 House intervention / intervention en chambre

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.