header image
The world according to David Graham


acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  2. January 17th, 2020
  3. January 16th, 2020
  4. January 15th, 2020
  5. January 14th, 2020
  6. January 13th, 2020
  7. January 12th, 2020
  8. January 11th, 2020
  9. January 10th, 2020
  10. January 9th, 2020
  11. January 8th, 2020
  12. January 7th, 2020
  13. January 6th, 2020
  14. January 5th, 2020
  15. January 4th, 2020
  16. January 3rd, 2020
  17. January 2nd, 2020
  18. January 1st, 2020
  19. December 31st, 2019
  20. December 30th, 2019
  21. December 29th, 2019
  22. December 28th, 2019
  23. December 27th, 2019
  24. December 26th, 2019
  25. December 24th, 2019
  26. December 6th, 2019
  27. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  28. Next steps
  29. On what electoral reform reforms
  30. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  31. older entries...

2016-03-22 12:57 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Collective bargaining, Court orders, Government bills, Labour relations, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Second reading, Supreme Court of Canada

Conditions et horaires de travail, Cour suprême du Canada, Deuxième lecture, Gendarmerie royale du Canada, Négociations collectives, Ordonnances judiciaires, Relations de travail

Mr. Speaker, I think the government made the right decision in preparing the bill in compliance with the Supreme Court ruling and the timelines available. We have many years ahead of us to make a lot changes on all topics, but we met the requirements given to us by the Supreme Court and it is the right path to be taking. I appreciate the member's intervention. She is helping me greatly understand this file.

Monsieur le Président, je pense que le gouvernement a pris la bonne décision en rédigeant un projet de loi conforme à la décision de la Cour suprême et à l'échéancier fixé. Il nous reste de nombreuses années pour faire encore beaucoup de changements sur toutes sortes de sujets, mais nous répondons maintenant aux exigences de la Cour suprême. C'est ce que nous devions faire. J'apprécie l'intervention de la députée. Elle m'aide beaucoup à comprendre ce dossier.

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 15:26 on March 22, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-03-22 12:55:30 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv | 2016-03-24 SMEM 1

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.