header image
The world according to David Graham


acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Why do lockdowns and pandemic restrictions continue to exist?
  2. Parliamentary privilege: an arcane concept that can prevent coups
  3. It's not over yet
  4. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  5. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  6. Next steps
  7. On what electoral reform reforms
  8. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  9. 2019 Summer newsletter / infolettre été 2019
  10. 2019-07-15 SECU 171
  11. 2019-06-20 RNNR 140
  12. 2019-06-17 14:14 House intervention / intervention en chambre
  13. 2019-06-17 SECU 169
  14. 2019-06-13 PROC 162
  15. 2019-06-10 SECU 167
  16. 2019-06-06 PROC 160
  17. 2019-06-06 INDU 167
  18. 2019-06-05 23:27 House intervention / intervention en chambre
  19. 2019-06-05 15:11 House intervention / intervention en chambre
  20. 2019-06-04 INDU 166
  21. 2019-06-03 SECU 166
  22. 2019 June newsletter / infolettre juin 2019
  23. 2019-05-30 RNNR 137
  24. 2019-05-30 PROC 158
  25. 2019-05-30 INDU 165
  26. 2019-05-29 SECU 165
  27. 2019-05-29 ETHI 155
  28. 2019-05-28 ETHI 154
  29. 2019-05-28 ETHI 153
  30. 2019-05-27 ETHI 151
  31. older entries...

Ian Murdock responds to Debian­DCC Alliance trademark dispute

Earlier today we posted an article about the dispute between the Debian Project and the former Debian Common Core Alliance, now known as the DCC Alliance. Before press time we had not received a response from DCCA leader Ian Murdock, the founder of Progeny. Now we have.

NewsForge: You stated in your blog that you would like to see the DCC Alliance included as an official Debian sub­project. What moves are you and the DCC Alliance making toward this end?

Murdock: We're trying to be additive. Like any members of any community, we see more that could be done in areas that are of interest to us, and we're stepping up to do the work. We explicitly *don't* want to create yet another Debian derivative. Given that, it makes sense to do as much as we can within the context of the existing project.

NF: Do you believe the DCC Alliance's use of the Debian logo in its own logo is in compliance with the Debian Open Use Logo License?

Murdock: Yes. The Debian Open Use Logo License says, in its entirety, "This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the Debian project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project." So, according to that, the only requirement is that the logo be used to refer to the Debian project, which we're obviously doing.

NF: One of the gripes publicly listed by Debian's negotiator with the DCCA is that the Alliance has refused to issue a press release or formal announcement about the change in name from the Debian Common Core Alliance, or any kind of public explanation as to why the name was changed.

Murdock: We haven't refused to issue a press release; we just felt it wasn't the appropriate venue for such an announcement. I posted a message to my blog because I know members of the press who have appropriate context follow it, and if they thought their readers would consider the announcement news they would write about it. No one did that. People have clearly read it though ­­ I've had a few conversations since then, and I've been told, "I saw your blog; I won't refer to it as Debian Common Core," and the pieces that have mentioned the DCCA since then have all properly referred to it as the DCC Alliance.

NF: Are you familiar with the Debian­Volatile project? Could the DCCA be served by joining up with or supporting this existing sub­project instead of starting an alternative?

Murdock: Sure. We're open to working with any existing subproject. Working with debian­volatile would be a natural way to satisfy one of our goals, providing up­to­date drivers above a slower moving core, but that's just one piece of the puzzle. We're also thinking a lot about the core itself, building a certification program, and other issues.

NF: How does being the founder and namesake of the Debian Project affect your role and perhaps even you personally in a dispute between yourself and the Debian Project as it currently exists?

Murdock: I wouldn't call what currently exists a dispute between myself and the Debian project. If anything, it's a dispute between a handful of Debian developers and myself, and even that is exaggerating it.

NF: Do you believe that the frequent reference in DCCA press releases to your role as founder and namesake of Debian creates tension between you and Debian's developers, and may even contribute to the current disagreement?

Murdock: One of the things I've learned over the decade or so I've been doing this is that when your work is visible to large numbers of people, anything you do creates tension between you and somebody. :­) To actually answer your question: I'm Debian's founder. I have opinions about Debian, just like everyone else. Yes, the fact that I'm Debian's founder may draw more attention to my opinions about Debian than to those of others. I'm not sure what I can do about that short of not expressing them, and I'm not about to do that.

Originally posted to Linux.com 2005-10-19; reposted here 2019-11-24.

Posted at 11:00 on October 19, 2005

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

Debian Common Core Alliance loses 'Debian' from its name | foss | January 12th, 2006 (from Advogato)

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.