header image
The world according to David Graham

Topics

acva bili chpc columns committee conferences elections environment essays ethi faae foreign foss guelph hansard highways history indu internet leadership legal military money musings newsletter oggo pacp parlchmbr parlcmte politics presentations proc qp radio reform regs rnnr satire secu smem statements tran transit tributes tv unity

Recent entries

  1. Trump will win in 2020 (and keep an eye on 2024)
  2. January 17th, 2020
  3. January 16th, 2020
  4. January 15th, 2020
  5. January 14th, 2020
  6. January 13th, 2020
  7. January 12th, 2020
  8. January 11th, 2020
  9. January 10th, 2020
  10. January 9th, 2020
  11. January 8th, 2020
  12. January 7th, 2020
  13. January 6th, 2020
  14. January 5th, 2020
  15. January 4th, 2020
  16. January 3rd, 2020
  17. January 2nd, 2020
  18. January 1st, 2020
  19. December 31st, 2019
  20. December 30th, 2019
  21. December 29th, 2019
  22. December 28th, 2019
  23. December 27th, 2019
  24. December 26th, 2019
  25. December 24th, 2019
  26. December 6th, 2019
  27. A podcast with Michael Geist on technology and politics
  28. Next steps
  29. On what electoral reform reforms
  30. 2019 Fall campaign newsletter / infolettre campagne d'automne 2019
  31. older entries...

2016-04-11 17:14 House intervention / intervention en chambre

Budget deficit, Budgetary policy, Infrastructure

Déficit budgétaire, Infrastructure, Politique budgétaire

Madam Speaker, the Conservative member rambled on about the deficit as if his party has any expertise on the topic of solving the problem.

The deficit exists. It exists in the budget or it exists in the infrastructure that brings our country together. The deficit is there.

The Conservatives managed to score a twofer, ensuring that not only would the deficit add up to somewhere around $150 billion newly borrowed dollars, but that the infrastructure deficit—which includes the social infrastructure deficit, the road infrastructure deficit, the transit infrastructure deficit, the first nations infrastructure deficit, the digital infrastructure deficit, the rural infrastructure deficit, the educational infrastructure deficit—would also be left in place while growing the fiscal deficit without anything to show for it.

The deficit exists, no matter what. We can let the infrastructure deficit fester or we can invest in our future. I choose investment.

Madame la Présidente, le député conservateur a radoté au sujet du déficit comme si son parti avait l'expertise nécessaire pour régler le problème.

Le déficit existe. Il existe dans le budget ou dans les infrastructures qui unissent notre pays. Le déficit est là.

Les conservateurs ont veillé non seulement à créer un déficit d'environ 150 milliards de dollars d'argent nouvellement emprunté, mais également à ce que le déficit en matière d'infrastructures — ce qui comprend un déficit en matière d'infrastructures sociales, routières, de transport en commun, des Premières Nations, numériques, rurales et scolaires — demeure, tout en accroissant le déficit financier sans obtenir le moindre résultat en retour.

Le déficit existe, de toute façon. Nous pouvons laisser le déficit en matière d'infrastructures s'aggraver ou nous pouvons investir dans notre avenir. Je choisis l'investissement.

Watch | HansardEcoutez | Hansard

Posted at 15:26 on April 11, 2016

This entry has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.

2016-04-11 13:26 House intervention / intervention en chambre | hansard parlchmbr tv |

2016-04-12 13:32 House intervention / intervention en chambre

(RSS) Website generating code and content © 2001-2020 David Graham <david@davidgraham.ca>, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Comments are © their respective authors.